When preparing for this speech, I
thought a lot about what I was interested in as well as taking time to consider
what topics would capture the attention of my classmates. I started with focusing on something that we
could all relate too which proved to be hard considering we were a diverse
group of people of different ages but we did share the characteristic that we
were all USC students. Taking that, I thought a topic that was very important
for me to talk about was USC’s newest project, University Village. Even if the
project was something that most of us, including me, would never get to really
experience since I would graduate by then, I knew it would still be something
that concerned all of us because it is where our tuition money is going to and
as a part of the Trojan Family, just knowing the future of our school is
important to us.
This
assignment called for at least two scholarly articles and since the project is
so recent there aren’t any articles available, I decided to focus on ideas that
would work with scholarly articles. This is why I chose to speak more of why
the reconstruction of University Village would be beneficial to college
students because there are studies and journals on what improvements in social,
academic and environmental atmospheres can do to help students get the best
experience they can in college. I used mostly Google scholars to find my
articles and I read through journals written by Psychology students and
professors, then used their studies to help support points in my speech.
I think
that this speech went well in that I was knowledgeable about my topic and I
genuinely reported it because I thought it would be beneficial to know. This
makes it easier to talk about and inform people about the subject. I also think
I did a good job in making the speech and informational speech and avoiding
words that would make it into a persuasive speech. I kept the speech very
nonbiased by simply reporting on the new features of University Village, why it
would be important to students based on studies and what USC is doing to combat
any criticism and concerns.
What I
think I can work on for my next speech is to spend more time preparing the
speech. My speech was a little less than five minutes so maybe I can elaborate
on more points, and slow down my speech to add more effect to my words. I also
saw that other speakers used their sources actual names but I instead said them
as psychology professor or news articles, so next time I’m going to say actual
names and name the article that I am talking about such as, “Daily Trojan.” By
adding these in I think that it will make my speech more credible.
No comments:
Post a Comment